The New Years riots in Hong Kong are, in my view, a warning shot for what governors may expect in the future. For this kind of conduct, I cannot defend either side. The agents provocateurs started the confrontation and the police responded dutifully. There was excessive behaviour from each side of the barricades and, in the end, the show made good TV. One thing is for sure: there are hidden tensions and social problems, there is a sentiment apparent in the young students that the future may not be as bright as they once thought. In addition, people in Hong Kong tend to be very keen and independent. They are truly entrepreneurial. And they want things to happen their own way. They have a feeling of ownership of a place. They feel that Hong Kong belongs to them and, above all, they have a feeling of citizenship! Well, and now, why is this guy writing about Hong Kong? First of all, Hong Kong is normally ahead in terms of social convulsions when compared with Macau. Then, what happens in Hong Kong is normally reflected even with considerable delay in Macau. And, thirdly, there will be elections for the Chief Executive in 2017, just one year ahead. Decisive moments in terms of the Special Administrative Regions are ahead and this could have been only the beginning of something bigger. A hidden tension normally explodes through an unrelated event, as, for example, in May 2014 in Macau or the umbrellas in Hong Kong. People are demanding more from their governors. People are not stupid, as some try to label them. They really know that the bigger the riot the more they are heard in Beijing. This serves not only as a warning call for all responsible persons in, especially, both Administrative Regions but also in the Mainland. There are social problems that need to be addressed. And despite all efforts for the new normal, a social explosion is what should be avoided by all means. The fact that this happened during the Chinese New Year, with thousands of visitors from the Mainland assisting was not innocent. The so-called Scholarism comprises people who think and the worst that can happen to those that do not put the population first is when the population tends to start questioning the decisions and acts of their representatives. I do hope that Macau representatives can understand an old Portuguese adage (I like to play José Mourinho sometimes!): When you come upon the beard of your neighbour burning, put yours in the water.
Top Stories
RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR
OPINION – Investing in Diversification!
As the lights of the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, where the “Two...
【時事評論】公共工程需考慮長遠經濟社會效益
在經濟衰退的時候,著名經濟學家凱恩斯就會被搬出來,為政府加大投資,大興土木的建設基礎設施以推動經濟發展背書。此一說法被詬病多時,然而不少政府及政治人物卻情有獨鍾,甚至樂此不疲。内地奉行鋼筋水泥經濟多時,這股基建風南下到港澳,澳門近年的基建或者大大小小的各項公共工程無日無之,這些能否推動澳門經濟高質發展?事實唔使問阿貴,作用並不顯著。
OPINION – Forum Macau’s 6th Ministerial Conference: Will there be some good news for...
By José Luís de Sales Marques
The highly anticipated Forum...