The development of Hengqin Island is bound to be both an opportunity and a threat for Macau. The plan is clearly ambitious. Even if it is only partially fulfilled, it will move the centre of gravity of Zhuhai westwards and re-direct the physical and economic flows between the two cities. Whatever path our future development follows, by design or accident, is inevitably bound to theirs. In itself, that is not bad; it is the natural way of things. Hengqin has become, de facto, an unavoidable factor in the Macau equation of development. What we get from it and how we get there, however, are not irrelevant matters. That only makes more glaring the unavailability of a clear understanding of the role Hengqin – and by extension Zhuhai – can play, or how we would like them to fit into the plans, objectives, and needs of the Macau community. Hengqin can also become the competitor that will progressively void Macau of most of its economic functions. But these are issues we seldom see openly discussed. The development of Macau is first of all constrained by its geographical limits. The two possible approaches to deal with such limitation are land reclamation, which seems to be reaching its limits, or land cessions, which the present development of Hengqin removed from the list of options. That sets more stringent bounds to our range of choices, without any obvious ways around them. Such limitation is compounded by the apparent helplessness of the local polity to generate a shared vision about the feasible, let alone desirable, future for this community, and to identify alternative paths to achieving the social and economic objectives implied by that vision. Without an operational blueprint on this side, and the necessary actions and tools to back it, Hengqin will become progressively everything Macau always wanted to be and never was able to make happen. Exhibitions and other big events; hotels across the full range of categories to cater to a varied customer base; luxury condos and residences for the common citizens; shopping and entertainment facilities; transportation networks and leisure amenities you name it, they will have it. That diversification can be backed by a cheaper, more adaptable and renewable labour force, and more flexible land arrangements. What will Macau then become besides being the neighbourhood where one can gamble freely? Possibly a financial haven, until the evolution of Mainland capital markets makes it obsolete. Procrastination is not without cost.
Top Stories
RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR
【時事評論】困境未盡 艱難前行
一場新冠疫情,令2020成為人類百年一遇的世紀疫年,8千多萬人感染、逾182萬人死亡; 封城之下,環球經濟大衰退,苦不堪言。儘管疫苗已面世,但距全球有效防疫的目標仍然遙遠。展望2021仍是個艱難年頭,對澳門而言挑戰大過機遇,各位宜有心理準備,保持鬥志,做好防守。
OPINION – Soft figures
The ongoing economic slump has visible implications in casino revenues, visitor flows, and hotel occupation....
【主編前言】諮詢的作用
早前特區政府就南灣湖C區兩份興建司法機關的規劃條件圖作公示,及後在城規會聽取城規會議上交委員討論,並獲大部分委員支持。該兩份規劃圖是關於在現有初院刑事大樓、終審法院及中級法院大樓旁邊,分別興建法院及檢察院、法院設施。近初級法院院的大樓可建最高五十點八米。公示期間兩份規劃圖收到百三份反對意見,主要擔心樓高影響歷史城區,冀降低建築高度。
【總監之言】極具建設性
批判性思維是否值得鼓勵?初步答案似乎明顯“是”,但在《澳門青年政策(2021-2030)》諮詢文件中,這變成了一個相當微不足道的問題。上一個十年(2012-2020年)的藍圖確切地描述了培養具有“批判思維和獨立思考能力”的年輕一代的重要性;然而,在新提出的《政策》版本中,則以“較輕”的態度描述這些特質,因收集所得意見的偏好而捨棄了有關措辭,選擇用“審辨思維”描述“審視和辨識的能力”。根據社會文化司司長的解釋,導致改變用詞的背後原因是之前文件所使用的表述“批判”具有某種貶義或負面含義;她強調,歡迎持批評態度,但應該具有建設性。