Fresh air B&B

Since our Secretary for Social and Cultural Affairs has been in office, I have most of the time agreed with his political views and decisions. Furthermore, he is a polite politician with a constant smile on his face, even when there are difficult decisions to take. These days, finding someone with his character and profile is not easy.
That appreciation does not prevent criticism of his recent statement relating to the possibility of legalising the popular B&B concept, which if practiced is considered a crime under current law.
The world has developed very fast in recent years to the extent that, contrary to his statement, tourists demand other types of accommodation. Alternatives to hotels, which sometimes overcharge visitors and place lots of restrictions and other conditions, are welcome everywhere in the civilized world. With rules, of course, the goal of which is to protect the consumer.
There are examples in some parts of the world that could be taken by our administration to the benefit of the diversification of the economy whilst putting more money in the pockets of Macau residents.
The best of those alternatives is that consumers negatively rate places, owners and businesses that do not deliver. On the other hand, places with sometimes better conditions than hotels, can be rated well and charge more. It is the market functioning at its best.
From a government perspective, it could be also another source of revenue as taxes generated by the enterprises should not be disregarded. Another class of entrepreneur, particularly young people, can, after risking their hand in other areas, create other ventures from income they earn. In addition, more jobs are created and thus the economy will benefit everyone.
Is this a dream? Well, taken into consideration the latest statement by our Secretary, yes. Macau, which could be an outstanding tourism destination, seems to like the fate of having a sole type of visitor. Those who go to the casinos, who take travel agency packages, and cannot have a click and stay option. Once again, with rules, which, I am sure, the great advisors of the Government will be very capable of putting in place to the benefit of all: residents, visitors, public coffers, suppliers, contractors who could refurbish the places . . . in a nutshell, to the benefit of the diversification of the economy.
I wish all readers and friends a great Year of the Rooster!